Both of these outstanding women were beloved by students and staff.
Both received outpourings of support at LSC meetings.
Both received outpourings of support in protests at Board meetings.
Only one was selected to have the support of the Board and the Mayor.
So what is the difference between these two amazing educators?
One is a teacher. The other is a principal.
Kinda makes you think that the people downtown don't really care about teachers, doesn't it?
Here is the text of an email sent by Ms. Eshoo to Mr. Vaughn, CPS Spokesperson:
Dear Mr. Vaughn,
I read, with interest, your comments about your/the Bd. disappointment over the Curie HS LSC vote.
A comparable situation occurred at Lincoln Park in the early fall. Nearly 900 students signed a support petition and the vast majority of staff members supported my reinstatement, the Friends of LPHS group supported me - as well as many parents, alumni, and community members.
When we contacted to the Bd . for assistance, it turned its back and hid behind “the process”. You were televised with statements supporting the fact the process of my termination was handled in a correct manner. Now that it is a well regarded competent administrator being terminated, you/the Bd. find it a disappointing and regrettable situation.
You/the Bd. should not flip flop on your evaluation of the “process”; it makes you and the Bd. members appear to be hypocrites.
Ms. Bernie Eshoo
Makes you wonder just how much the Board cares about "quality" in the classroom.
Your thoughts?
2 comments:
Teachers are serfs, indentured in educationland. Why do the new principals call for "bright, dynamic teachers with personality" and never mention credentials, including their own? Why is experience a foul word? Why are tenured teachers at the beck and call of new principals with a day's experience?
Why do teachers have no career path in CPS==since any new principal can appoint--at will.
Post a Comment